17 Comments
User's avatar
Eric's avatar

This is one of the best things i’ve ever read.

And to answer you questions:

I’m in New Jersey.

And the part that made me most angry is probably the fact that the department chooses the target first, then builds the case later, and uses that to target political enemies, and not real criminals and actual dangerous people-For example, Jeff Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and the entire network of people who protect them. They did one of the most evil things ever- they ran a worldwide sex trafficking and pdf file operation. At the highest levels of power.

But practically all of it made me angry

But the end gave me hope. Because you’re right. We do need to speak up. We do need so educate our families and friends and networks about this stuff. We need to see who is on what side and we need to take a stand. Everyday americans.

Because it’s Treason.

Bob's avatar

California/ Jimmy Paneta

his Justice Department now has one client, and you are not him.

Janet Little's avatar

Incredible. But for me, anger stands far behind fear. Not enough to stay silent, but enough to know what this information portends if silence wins.

Joseph McPhillips's avatar

Hiring grifters, pardoning war criminals, & dismissing heroes: #TrumpianLiesKill tens of thousands.

Ret. Admiral McRaven: "Americans, we should be frightened — deeply afraid for the future of the nation. When good men and women can’t speak the truth.”

Trump goes to war with public health research, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and other pandemic experts. Heroes like Dr. Fauci deserve respect, not Trump’s attacks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6wIOKaHMWo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dngf8FThNy0

Juliaf's avatar

The DOJ is a lost cause until a new president, one with serving the American people in mind, is elected. Hopefully great lawyers and judges will continue to bring them to heel.

Quick questions for you: why is the transcript of Blanche’s interview with Maxwell not part of the Epstein files and subject to release under the Transparency Act?

colo-ski's avatar

I think the A-weaponization fund is basically just buying votes.

The same thing that a lot of Republicans complain about claim Biden was doing by having open borders, even though they weren't / arent voting.

Mitch Jackson's avatar

It's absolutely a device intended to solidify MAGA support. Trump's real concern with preserving the settlement has to do with the IRS immunity.

BigDaddy52's avatar

Also intended to have his brownshirts loaded and locked for coup replay at certification time.

Mitch Jackson's avatar

That may happen, but the bigger concern has to do with the paperwork, and I did a deep dive on that in the post. I know Mark Elias feels the same way.

BigDaddy52's avatar

Yep. Very informative, as usual. Grateful a law degree isn't necessary to comprehend.

Am looking forward to how your new format plays out. Just hope you don't over-compensate (burn out) by trying to work too much into fewer posts.

Mitch Jackson's avatar

I’m enjoying Substack. It’s my therapy. 🤠

BigDaddy52's avatar

Yep. Very informative, as usual. Grateful a law degree isn't necessary to comprehend.

Am looking forward to how your new format plays out. Just hope you don't over-compensate (burn out) by trying to work too much into fewer posts.

colo-ski's avatar

I will re iterate what some including RonF have said.

This is a gangster govt, an organized crime syndicate, with a different label.

Mitch Jackson's avatar

And American voters are the judge and jury, and we're about ready to take care of business in November.

colo-ski's avatar

Self dealing clown sheitshow

Mitch Jackson's avatar

A very dangerous one at that.