This sounds like par for the course. Everyone who accepts a position or nomination from Trump knows that they are expected to be a loyal lackey first and foremost. Jay Clayton will perform that job, even if it means trying to undermine the election - because anyone who works for Trump immediately looses their integrity. Republican Senators are clearly not going to worry about him, unlike the sudden stand over Todd Blanche.
thanks for this information. I just got off the phone with a nice many at Tim Scotts office in Washington. I asked him the question, " why did you vote for Jay Clayton who has no experience in intelligence when it is specifically stated in the rules for this position that whoever is put up for nomination SHALL have extensive experience in this area. I don't think Tulse had much experience either. I was told that I will get a response. I hope so because all the times I tried to hear from Lindsey I got nothing.
another private sector dirtbag with zero experience in the public sector that has no business being in the position he’s in and all because the private sector oligarchs think they’re the smartest people in the room (they’re not).
Clayton is another example on the long list of people in the Trump administration who are unqualified for the positions they hold. It's not accidental, it's purposeful. The goal is to destroy our country and democracy as quickly as possible and steal as much as they can on the way out. To those who think this is fear mongering, look what has happened every day since Trump took office and tell me that is not what is happening. My hope for the upcoming election is that voters will believe what they know is true and tune out what these authoritarians will be saying in their ma$$ively funded campaign ads.
One of many letters to Congress today, an example:
Subject: Upholding Statutory Expertise Requirements in National‑Security Leadership
Dear Members of Congress,
I am writing to urge strict adherence to the statutory qualifications established in 50 U.S.C. § 3023(a)(1), which requires that any nominee for Director of National Intelligence possess extensive national‑security expertise. This requirement was enacted to prevent politicization of intelligence leadership and to ensure that the United States is guided by seasoned, objective professionals during periods of heightened risk.
Today’s geopolitical environment demands unwavering commitment to that standard. Escalating tensions with Iran, ongoing instability in the Middle East, and domestic enforcement controversies have intensified public concern about the integrity and competence of federal institutions. When Congress confirms individuals whose backgrounds fall far outside traditional national‑security domains, it signals that political considerations may be outweighing statutory qualifications. This erodes public trust at a moment when trust itself is a strategic asset.
The American people expect intelligence leadership capable of managing complex threats, coordinating across agencies, and providing objective analysis insulated from political pressure. Inexperienced leadership increases the likelihood of misjudgment, mismanagement, and weakened oversight—risks that become more dangerous during international crises or domestic fear and uncertainty.
I respectfully urge Congress to reaffirm the intent of §3023(a)(1) and ensure that future nominees to critical national‑security positions meet the high standard the law requires. Expertise is not optional. It is the foundation of public confidence and the safeguard of our national security.
No argument here. Here's the thing, Clayton is an extremely educated person who is smart enough to realize what he needs to say and do to keep Trump happy. At the same time, and as I mentioned in the article, he has zero real experience when it comes to national intelligence. There are literally hundreds of more qualified individuals who should be director.
What's interesting is the switchboard will put you through to the offices of any congressperson or senator you ask for, so our calls don't need to be limited to just our specific representatives. Thanks for picking up the phone and making it happen.
This sounds like par for the course. Everyone who accepts a position or nomination from Trump knows that they are expected to be a loyal lackey first and foremost. Jay Clayton will perform that job, even if it means trying to undermine the election - because anyone who works for Trump immediately looses their integrity. Republican Senators are clearly not going to worry about him, unlike the sudden stand over Todd Blanche.
More devastation. It won't end or slow down. It is a raging fire and no one can put it out. This situation is astounding. Thank you for sharing.
On top of severely depleted munitions and an absolute moron in charge of the military.
What could possibly go wrong?
It'll be Red Dawn all over again, but MAGA will be fighting for Russia, against real Americans.
thanks for this information. I just got off the phone with a nice many at Tim Scotts office in Washington. I asked him the question, " why did you vote for Jay Clayton who has no experience in intelligence when it is specifically stated in the rules for this position that whoever is put up for nomination SHALL have extensive experience in this area. I don't think Tulse had much experience either. I was told that I will get a response. I hope so because all the times I tried to hear from Lindsey I got nothing.
another private sector dirtbag with zero experience in the public sector that has no business being in the position he’s in and all because the private sector oligarchs think they’re the smartest people in the room (they’re not).
Clayton is another example on the long list of people in the Trump administration who are unqualified for the positions they hold. It's not accidental, it's purposeful. The goal is to destroy our country and democracy as quickly as possible and steal as much as they can on the way out. To those who think this is fear mongering, look what has happened every day since Trump took office and tell me that is not what is happening. My hope for the upcoming election is that voters will believe what they know is true and tune out what these authoritarians will be saying in their ma$$ively funded campaign ads.
One of many letters to Congress today, an example:
Subject: Upholding Statutory Expertise Requirements in National‑Security Leadership
Dear Members of Congress,
I am writing to urge strict adherence to the statutory qualifications established in 50 U.S.C. § 3023(a)(1), which requires that any nominee for Director of National Intelligence possess extensive national‑security expertise. This requirement was enacted to prevent politicization of intelligence leadership and to ensure that the United States is guided by seasoned, objective professionals during periods of heightened risk.
Today’s geopolitical environment demands unwavering commitment to that standard. Escalating tensions with Iran, ongoing instability in the Middle East, and domestic enforcement controversies have intensified public concern about the integrity and competence of federal institutions. When Congress confirms individuals whose backgrounds fall far outside traditional national‑security domains, it signals that political considerations may be outweighing statutory qualifications. This erodes public trust at a moment when trust itself is a strategic asset.
The American people expect intelligence leadership capable of managing complex threats, coordinating across agencies, and providing objective analysis insulated from political pressure. Inexperienced leadership increases the likelihood of misjudgment, mismanagement, and weakened oversight—risks that become more dangerous during international crises or domestic fear and uncertainty.
I respectfully urge Congress to reaffirm the intent of §3023(a)(1) and ensure that future nominees to critical national‑security positions meet the high standard the law requires. Expertise is not optional. It is the foundation of public confidence and the safeguard of our national security.
Pretty much the state of affairs everywhere in this shipwreck
Another great read albeit hard to ♥️!
#CongressSucks
Trump requires only one qualification for any job. Blind loyalty to him.
No argument here. Here's the thing, Clayton is an extremely educated person who is smart enough to realize what he needs to say and do to keep Trump happy. At the same time, and as I mentioned in the article, he has zero real experience when it comes to national intelligence. There are literally hundreds of more qualified individuals who should be director.
Calls made to uncle tim scott and ralph norman. Both offices thanked me for my input.
What's interesting is the switchboard will put you through to the offices of any congressperson or senator you ask for, so our calls don't need to be limited to just our specific representatives. Thanks for picking up the phone and making it happen.