13 Comments
User's avatar
Haliborn's avatar

And don’t forget about the BILLION DOLLARS that has gone missing!! I think a drug addled ketamine addict might have it.

Rebecca Hamalian's avatar

Is anyone really surprised by this ?

Gigi's avatar

Where are the charges against Musk and his corrupt minions he put there to steal Give data in alnthe depts.

John Omaha's avatar

The hack involved Musk’s Starlink which transmitted all the stolen data directly to Russia.

Positivechange's avatar

We are so cooked.

Y eYe I's avatar

People, are we fucking getting this, NOW?

Gabe's avatar

They weren't going after fraud and abuse they were going after data

Erudite's avatar

ALL  DOGE  CUTS  GO  DIRECTLY  TO  THE RICH  … the cuts are required by conservatives for their votes for the tax cuts ….  No cuts … no tax cut for the rich … thus ALL  DOGE  TAX  CUTS  PAY  FOR  THE  TAX  CUT  FOR  THE  RICH  ….. all the things cut are direct paying for a huge freebee dollop for the rich! STARVING CHILDREN will not have USAID FOOD because that money is going to the US rich. “Waste, Fraud and Abuse” is a lie …. “Government Efficiency” is a lie … they are fake tag lines to sucker the public to sell the budget deficit cuts required to get conservative votes to pass trumps tax cut for the rich.  The only driver is to get the tax cut for the rich.   1000 children will starve in Ethiopia (USAID DOGE cuts) and a poor US single mothers child will not get medical treatment (Medicare DOGE cuts) all to pay for a US rich persons new sports car tires (Trumps tax cut for the rich).  Very simple.   Children starving in Africa, US sick children losing healthcare, homeless veterans sleeping in the cold, fired agency staffers, cancelled renewable energy projects, etc …. These fund the Trump tax cut for the rich …… DOGE  CUTS  ARE  REQUIRED  FOR  CONSERVATIVE  VOTES  TO  PASS  TRUMP’S  TAX  CUT  FOR  THE  RICH

Jeremiah's avatar

While it’s important to scrutinize power and hold major players accountable, this article feels more like political sabre-rattling than a sincere attempt at thoughtful critique. The headline is sensational, accusing Elon Musk’s DOGE of “hacking” the NLRB, but it’s not substantiated with credible technical evidence or clear legal reasoning. That kind of framing seems designed more for virality than for clarity.

The suggestion that DOGE is being used to undermine federal institutions via hacking crosses into conspiracy-theory territory. There’s no sourced documentation or cybersecurity analysis pointing to any actual breach or coordinated campaign. Without hard data, claims like these risk muddying the waters of public discourse.

Unfortunately, this kind of narrative rewards outrage and click-throughs more than it promotes understanding. What would actually help is a rigorous discussion on the role of corporate influence in labor relations, or a debate over how decentralized technologies might affect regulatory bodies. But instead, we get speculative drama dressed up as journalism.

Let’s aim higher. Real discourse demands more than just clicks, it deserves clarity, context, and actual facts.

Gary Levin's avatar

Is this why DOGE wants to defend NPR?

Chuck Moran's avatar

Hi, Mitch. Thanks for making this story easily understood and for including the US code violations somebody ought to be leveling against these DOGE guys. Trouble is, with our DOJ being utterly compromised, we’re pretty much left with calling our Senators and Representative (which I’ll do), and supporting attorneys who will undoubtedly bring suits.

Mitch Jackson's avatar

My pleasure, Chuck. And I agree—under our current leadership, nothing will change. Just like Signalgate, there’s zero accountability.