45 Comments
User's avatar
Mari Frank's avatar

I love this Mitch. I missed this one since I was in the car driving 22 hours with hubby and 2 dogs to Massachusetts from Fl to see family. Thanks for sharing this wisdom. Being called woke is a compliment! It means you are emotionally intelligent and spiritually connected ! Now we are driving back 22 hrs but hubby is driving so I can catch up. I so appreciate all your commentaries ! Living in Florida for the past 5 years in Trump country - with a husband who drank the koolaid- has tested all my mediation skills and my emotional intelligence evolutionary process. I feel so legitimized when I read your posts.

erin's avatar

Woke lunacy trying to do better PR. Hah.

Nice try.

No cigar.

Joseph McPhillips's avatar

Republicans wreck the economy, balloon the deficit & transfer wealth to the wealthiest.

Flawed, not perfect Dems are at least an order of magnitude better than the Trump & Co packs of depraved sociopaths. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_i38-qjtbI Resist corrupt authoritarians. Please, 86 47 & his capos with a Blue Tsunami. #VoteBlue!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6ji9EFt9Lg

The unrelenting propaganda of Trump's Lost Cause mythology: https://www.splcenter.org/resources/hatewatch/investigative-update-lost-cause-mythology-propaganda/

Timothy Snyder 6/27/26 https://snyder.substack.com/p/of-stoicism-and-stupor?r=aexlz&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

Part of the story of Marcus Aurelius, which, despite the fact that he chose not to tell it himself, or rather precisely for that reason, is instructive about our predicament today. Stoicism is a way not to be a stranger to the world; it can protect the powerful from vanity and folly. To fall into a stupor of self-absorption, as Trump has done, is to flee from reality.

Barbara Craig's avatar

Being woke is being aware. It is not a potent insult but could even be a point of pride.

Bud's avatar

Oddly enough, I would say absolutely yes to everything you wrote and describe it as conservative. And I was going to say it’s funny, but it’s really not funny that the definition of that word has been shedded the same way the definition of the word woke has! We’re on the same team Mitch, we truly want the same things, we just see ourselves and describe ourselves differently. Love your stuff! Keep at it!!

Lori Block's avatar

How about shirts that say "The Founding Fathers Were Woke."

pualani36's avatar

Proud to be Woke!!

Richard Bain's avatar

I'm woke and proud of it. Woke is the message iof the Statue of Liberty. Woke is marching across the Edmund Pettus Bridge. Woke is standing up against wrong Woke is standing with Washington, Lincoln , TR, FDR,, Eisenhower, MLK, JFK,RFK, LBJ, Medgar, Malcolm X, our fathers and grandfathers who fought and died combating fascism and discrimination and the millions who have marched alongside. Being woke is being true to the ideals of America. It is what America is about.

Kathleen Fernandez's avatar

I want to be awake, not asleep at the wheel. Complaints about wokeness mean the complainer don't notice anyone different from them or suffering. They lack empathy.

Charlie's avatar

If someone says you're "woke," how do we politely observe they are asleep at the wheel?

Lori Block's avatar

I think saying they are "asleep at the wheel" is denying reality in most cases. There are far too many people actively cheering this Administration's assault on the RIGHTS (not just opportunies previously open to) people of color, members of the LGBTQ+ community, religious minorities, and people with disabilities. It's morally reprehensible.

Laurie's avatar

Damn right I am

Mitch Jackson's avatar

Right on! Let's go!

Ned McDoodle's avatar

A marvellous, powerful essay that evokes the presence of G-D: “The world is based on three things - on the Torah, on the service of God, and upon acts of loving-kindness.” Ethics of the Fathers (Pirkei Avot); Chapter-1, Misha-2.

¿Do I find 'woke' to be inconvenient?

Yep.

¿Does ‘woke’ stretch my comfort zone?

Yep.

¿So should I ignore ‘woke’ and implore others to?

N-0-P-E

¿What on Earth can be wrong with making our society a better one, little-by-little and day-*by-day?

https://youtu.be/ekoHxB4idmg?t=5

Mitch Jackson's avatar

Thanks, Ned. You're right. It's not that complicated. It's not that hard. It's not that inconvenient, and it's the right thing to do.

Ned McDoodle's avatar

Thank you, Sir.🫱🏻‍🫲🏽

Bryan Padrick's avatar

Damn right I’m woke.

Tracy Ann's avatar

This title would go great on a t-shirt…or even better on a red ballcap!

Mitch Jackson's avatar

I think I'll add it to my uncensored objection merch. The link's at the top of the website. But they'll be no red baseball caps. That's just something I could never wrap my head around.

Charlie's avatar

How about nice green? (Not olive, not army, not Kelly) Something to evoke Nature, which we damn well better Wake Up to, now!

Emma's avatar

Oh no no no, sorry but Gavin made his bed so we are not unmaking that now. I have gone full circle with him, from his initial election against my wishes, to loving him after his marriage stance, to finding compromise and thinking he would be our best option in dc, to horror at his first trans statement because I knew what that would usher in, to happiness when he finally got a good online team, to horror again when he made another swipe at the marginalized. Technically I don't fall into any of those groups, either those who he supported or attacked. This is not a bias response, or at least I do not believe it to be. And yes, given the range of the emotional wheel for which I hold him responsible, he either owes me therapy or a bar.

Mitch Jackson's avatar

I understand. Having said that, I think he'd make an amazing president.

Gail Rieder's avatar

I would love to hear more of your thoughts about him.

Emma's avatar

I have given my prior comment about voting for him an unreasonable amount of analysis in the last couple of hours; my own response did not sit well with me. I think he would do fine internationally, and I think he can handle the economic side, but I have decided that I would not vote for him. I honestly am not sure what his principles are, nor would I trust him not to change with the wind. He is also too close to many people that I believe should not be near our government, and I do not trust that this would not impact decisions. I simply cannot get past some of his statements and moves in the last two years. I don't think I would like me if I voted for him, and for me that is always my litmus test. To each their own.

Lori Block's avatar

Hypothetical, but very possible, scenario: Vance vs. Newsom. Who would you vote for? Keep in mind, that the people who chose not to vote very likely contributed significantly to the results of the last election.

Newsom is not perfect. But he's tried to thread the needle on some very complicated issues. But he's steered California through some particularly choppy waters, and now the state sits firmly at #4 most powerful economy in the world; it's ranking vis-a-vis public schools among states has risen significantly (whether that's a sign of California improving or other states declining, or a combination of the two is hard to say); it ranks at or near the top in such healthcare metrics as number of residents with healthcare insurance, and lowest infant and maternal mortality rates; and he's stood up to Trump and represents Californian ideals. His willingness to stick his neck out on redistricting will likely prove to be vitally important, too.

Emma's avatar

That was exactly what I thought about earlier - that match up. Re schools - other states going down, not CA going up, but that is not Newsom’s fault [UCs want SAT back, at least for stem minimum; kids are not ready and it is a problem. I would vote green. If he would have just come out and owned his errors I might have had a different answer. This clip hella grated me though. It was really disingenuous to try it this way.

Emma's avatar

Lol if necessary I would still vote for him, probably over most. He does learn, sometimes slowly. I don't think he has ever had a strong team around him and that has been part of the problem. He is a follower not a leader in some ways, which is fine, as long as the pack is strong.

Mommabear's avatar

Thanks for clarifying!! Now tell Pete Hegseth to STFU!

Mitch Jackson's avatar

I'm trying. Every single day.

Emma's avatar

If we sell tickets to his trial by the day, at the same price as paramount sold for ufc - about 9 bucks, and assume as many people buy them as subscribe to paramount - say 80 million which is probably low, we would be likely to handle a large portion of our national debt by day 30.