Would you want this person representing you in anything? "Find out where the Smithsonian went wrong." "Live up to what the president wants the Smithsonian and DC to be." "It's the capital of our city." Really. The string in her back is almost fully functional.
I would almost like her to try to present a case. I heard in passing that she entered the the wrong courtroom. When she found the right one, she stood on the wrong side of the bench (she is the prosecution and typically is positioned to the right of the judge and closest to the jury box). Very apropos. Illegal appointment and a complete novice.
I have not heard or watched MSNBC yet today. Has everything you've said here already come to fruition? That is, has all this already been announced by the federal government, and by the judge? Has the case already been dismissed? Or, are you merely surmising what SHOULD come to pass?
I hope it's already been dismissed, even though I personally gontcgicmve a damn what happens to Coney, because he gave the election to the Felon-Fuhrer in 2016. But, since his indictment is unlawful and the bubble-headed "prosecutor"/insurance lawyer is a fraud, I didn't want him prosecuted.
These are my takeaways based on the file and the case. I noticed a few other legal experts mention some of these issues yesterday, which pushed me to dig deeper. Think of this post as early breaking news, the kind the networks should already be covering. That’s the mission of Uncensored Objection, getting you the facts, the details, and my perspective as stories break, so our community stays ahead and informed, even when the major outlets stay silent.
UPDATE: Comey's team files motion to dismiss. Fantastic analysis from Joyce Vance...
https://open.substack.com/pub/joycevance/p/comey-moves-to-dismiss?r=2fe7t3&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
Yah!!! 😊♥️🎊🎉
Judy Chupasko
Let's see how well Bondi's statement ages.
https://x.com/AGPamBondi/status/1971691197170340008
Would you want this person representing you in anything? "Find out where the Smithsonian went wrong." "Live up to what the president wants the Smithsonian and DC to be." "It's the capital of our city." Really. The string in her back is almost fully functional.
https://x.com/atrupar/status/1958522178548498795
I would almost like her to try to present a case. I heard in passing that she entered the the wrong courtroom. When she found the right one, she stood on the wrong side of the bench (she is the prosecution and typically is positioned to the right of the judge and closest to the jury box). Very apropos. Illegal appointment and a complete novice.
This is a great piece of news in an otherwise chaotic week of MAGA nonsense!
Fingers crossed Peter. Let's see what happens next!
I have not heard or watched MSNBC yet today. Has everything you've said here already come to fruition? That is, has all this already been announced by the federal government, and by the judge? Has the case already been dismissed? Or, are you merely surmising what SHOULD come to pass?
I hope it's already been dismissed, even though I personally gontcgicmve a damn what happens to Coney, because he gave the election to the Felon-Fuhrer in 2016. But, since his indictment is unlawful and the bubble-headed "prosecutor"/insurance lawyer is a fraud, I didn't want him prosecuted.
So, has the case been officially dismissed today?
These are my takeaways based on the file and the case. I noticed a few other legal experts mention some of these issues yesterday, which pushed me to dig deeper. Think of this post as early breaking news, the kind the networks should already be covering. That’s the mission of Uncensored Objection, getting you the facts, the details, and my perspective as stories break, so our community stays ahead and informed, even when the major outlets stay silent.