Anyone who thinks the world's RICHEST individual couldn't pull this off one way or another to favor the candidate he WORSHIPPED is deluding themselves, both he and OrangeGINA boasted about how Musk' computer skills won the election for him. There's NO WAY Harris didn't win, her rallies were MASSIVE, she raised the largest amount of funds in the shortest amount of time ever, and all she spoke about was the PEOPLE, the "little guy and gal" the working stiffs.
You also have to remember how many times the candidate said himself that it’s all set, you won’t need to vote anymore. He’s far too good at telling on himself.
She said that he specifically referenced space lasers.
There was an issue in a Belgian election in 2003 that granted one candidate more votes because of gamma radiation interfering with the machine.
So, the idea here is that he used the lasers on strategically-placed Starlink satellites to cause some form of laser-induced bitflips. Usually that would have to be done at very close range however (eyeball to the specific chips you want to interfere with).
I am not smart enough to understand the possibilities here, but I imagine this would be a part of a plan, not the whole plan. For example, laser causes millisecond blip, 3rd party tool injects new data. Something like that.
Mitch, I have been saying this to people who keep saying the election was rigged and Musk used Starlink to alter the votes. It was all bullshit, but people don't want to deal with reality, the people voted for trump and people that voted for Biden would not vote for Harris they switched and voted for trump.
Then there's the 90 million who did not vote, AP and Pew Research surveyed some 9,000 people that did not vote, 44% of them said if they voted they would have voted for trump
America wanted a criminal as president not a woman of colour, America owns this
One detail not explored here is the use of covert equipment. Nothing James Bond-like, something much more mundane. And much less likely to be detected. And much less likely to even be suspected. Ever heard of an omg cable? I'll let you guys look it up.
The assumption prevalent in all this, is that the electoral technology wasn't hooked to the internet. Probably not, by ethernet cable or WiFi or other. But an omg cable looks identical to any usb-c cable. In every single way. If just one bad actor was present with just one of these cables, connection to starlink or any other network would be not just possible, but undetectable and more importantly unsuspected.
This is tech the CIA used to charge a fortune for (and still does afaik) but is now available for minimal outlay. It also has considerably long range capability. Once connected, perhaps on the auspices of charging a power pack or a mobile phone, it is data security's worst nightmare.
Check it out if you're doubtful of what i say. There's plenty info out there about it.
Then re-examine the whole thing using the new lens you have available.
MItch, your expertise is legal. Please follow the technical explanation of how this is possible:
Voting equipment is required to have battery backup to prevent power disturbances from interfering with elections, neither blockouts, brownouts, nor surges. These all occur uncorrelated, but can also be caused by sabotage so this is a generally wise policy.
HOWEVER, battery backup devices are given "root level" priority in consumer operating systems so they have superior access to the machine core beyond any security software used to prevent hacking.
A large percentage of those battery backup devices are supplied by Tripp-Lite, a long respected manufacturer of power protection devices. That company was sold to an entity with Peter Thiel as a major stockholder, and the proceeds of the sale were donated to 2024 Repuglican campaigns. The Tripp-Lite machines all have an Internet port to update software and for "routine testing and maintenance" controlled by a company run server. This creates a back door with root access into a vast number of voting machines, and the ability to monitor and change the voting counts in real time EVEN THOUGH THE VOTING MACHINE DOES NOT HAVE A DIRECT CONNECTION TO THE INTERNET.
Free lance investigators discovered this back door after detecting a troubling pattern in voting. In many counties in swing states, an anomalous number of ballots voting a straight Democratic slate but missing a choice for president appeared starting around noon. These resulted in slightly over the margin for Trump that would trigger an automatic recount. The pattern was so strong that it is not possible to be randomness.
What then was Musk talking about when texting Ashley St. Clair? How did Musk conclude T won prior to results being aired? Seems there was some conspiracy and manipulations. T o solve much of this all that is required is hand counts of ballots. Politicians refuse through their silence and lack of commentary to do this. There is a lot of evidence the vote counts were manipulated. This needs justification. There needs to vote counts in this democratic republic, bottom line. Only then can we resolve the many questiions posted by analysis and staistical data. Why no to a count? Why the cover-up by our elected officials?
For sure. I actually believe she's stating what he told her. She read his actual text to her during an interview. And I also believe Musk used every lever he had to sway the election (mostly money and social media influence). But as presented in the post, we didn't see any evidence to support that satellites were used.
Grateful for your tackling of this unwieldy hornet’s nest that is difficult for many of us to wrap our aging brains around. My biggest concern is that I have not yet read or heard a logical explanation for the anomalies that were found and why on earth did we not actually see some audits done in the states where the data was the wonkiest.
I am interested in whatever explanation in regards to the Fake vote bank anyone cares to rationalize/debunk
Elon lives in an alternate universe. Some of his creative fantasies do turn into reality, ie, going to Mars. He can be dangerous to others. He will not get custody of Romlus, except for shared time. He has already demonstrated publicly how he uses X to gain attention.
Who are you though and what do you have to gain or lose in this? Why were there so many ballots in swing states voting Democrat down ballot but for Trump at the top? Why were the swing state results so severe toward Trump while non swing states had normal results? Mitch? Splain that.
I can't. Maybe there was election interference. This article was focused on whether or not satellites were used and it seems to confirm that that aspect of interference wasn't the case.
Thank you. If you’re interested in this actively, I hope you continue to dig. I am an intelligent person, I’ve been involved in information technology since the early 80’s, so I understand a little. My doubts come in as follows:
• I hear Trump say you’ll never have to vote again, we’ll have it fixed so good. And I don’t need your votes, we already have it fixed.
• I read Elon admit to being responsible for the outcome of the election. We all heard rumors that he would tamper with the outcome or the ballots. I read rumors that Elon sent pre-filled mail in ballots.
• Trump won all the swing states. That didn’t seem possible to me. I read that he won by a larger swing than usual. I read rumors that only the top of the ticket was Trump.
• The polls. I know, polls are inaccurate but I didn’t see it even close before the election.
Totally get it. And I appreciate your thoughts. Trump's comments would be inadmissible hearsay in court (not evidence). Rumors or comments from Musk are too. The point of my post was to see if there is any objective evidence linking the satellites to any of these issues. To date, I haven't seen it. Now that certainly doesn't mean there wasn't election interference by human beings on the ground and/or especially when it comes to false information, misinformation, and misleading social media posts. But that's a different issue, separate and apart from satellite interference. If I see something concrete, I certainly will update my article. I'm not trying to be right on this issue. I'm just sharing an objective analysis based upon the recent news stories.
Also, even though she is in litigation with Elon, it doesn’t necessarily negate her revelations. She didn’t go into detail because she doesn’t know, but she revealed what she heard. People often become turncoats when they’re angry. So that doesn’t negate what she says to me.
I was suspicious at first, but I think you’re sincere now, after your responses. As a trial lawyer you can only use the evidence you have. I know you were discussing satellite interference, although you drew a conclusion based on available information. Of course, that’s all we have, good or bad. There are other ways to hack an outcome though:
• Electronic warfare — jamming communications or GPS signals, also real.
• Cyber warfare — hacking networks or systems.
Since both Elon and Trump are criminal braggarts, my take is that they were bragging while revealing, as psychopathic criminals do.
It’s upsetting to me that these criminals are so blatant, while we are helpless to suffer the consequences. I’m grateful, so very grateful for people like you. Thank you.
This "issue" makes me wish we had a National Service that required citizens to be trained in how elections are done--the actual handling of ballots etc. I know enough from friends to know it is detailed, intensive, DULL, double-and triple-checking work.
Election security questions originated as a right wing psy-op. But elections are complicated systems, and Republicans really do not do "complicated." Club you over the head, yes. Think through a problem even at an undergraduate level of reasoning and knowledge? No. Just look at DOGE (or Iran).
Poor Ashley St. Clair, locked for life into drama. Elon bragged he had fixed the election for Trump. Was this before he had lured her into bed? Or was he just peacocking around? Just the way he carried on about
Anyone who thinks the world's RICHEST individual couldn't pull this off one way or another to favor the candidate he WORSHIPPED is deluding themselves, both he and OrangeGINA boasted about how Musk' computer skills won the election for him. There's NO WAY Harris didn't win, her rallies were MASSIVE, she raised the largest amount of funds in the shortest amount of time ever, and all she spoke about was the PEOPLE, the "little guy and gal" the working stiffs.
You also have to remember how many times the candidate said himself that it’s all set, you won’t need to vote anymore. He’s far too good at telling on himself.
She said that he specifically referenced space lasers.
There was an issue in a Belgian election in 2003 that granted one candidate more votes because of gamma radiation interfering with the machine.
So, the idea here is that he used the lasers on strategically-placed Starlink satellites to cause some form of laser-induced bitflips. Usually that would have to be done at very close range however (eyeball to the specific chips you want to interfere with).
I am not smart enough to understand the possibilities here, but I imagine this would be a part of a plan, not the whole plan. For example, laser causes millisecond blip, 3rd party tool injects new data. Something like that.
Thank you so much for this article! People need to get back to reality. Not enough people voted and the racism and sexism is a real thing here.
Yes, you're absolutely correct Carrie, I agree 👍 with you
Mitch, I have been saying this to people who keep saying the election was rigged and Musk used Starlink to alter the votes. It was all bullshit, but people don't want to deal with reality, the people voted for trump and people that voted for Biden would not vote for Harris they switched and voted for trump.
Then there's the 90 million who did not vote, AP and Pew Research surveyed some 9,000 people that did not vote, 44% of them said if they voted they would have voted for trump
America wanted a criminal as president not a woman of colour, America owns this
" and people that voted for Biden would not vote for Harris they switched and voted for trump."
I don't buy that, they saw trumps FIRST disasterous 4 years, there's no way they'd happily set themselves up for another round of THAT!
💯 Brett
Have you seen any of the articles by This Will Hold? Lots of good information about this from them.
One detail not explored here is the use of covert equipment. Nothing James Bond-like, something much more mundane. And much less likely to be detected. And much less likely to even be suspected. Ever heard of an omg cable? I'll let you guys look it up.
The assumption prevalent in all this, is that the electoral technology wasn't hooked to the internet. Probably not, by ethernet cable or WiFi or other. But an omg cable looks identical to any usb-c cable. In every single way. If just one bad actor was present with just one of these cables, connection to starlink or any other network would be not just possible, but undetectable and more importantly unsuspected.
This is tech the CIA used to charge a fortune for (and still does afaik) but is now available for minimal outlay. It also has considerably long range capability. Once connected, perhaps on the auspices of charging a power pack or a mobile phone, it is data security's worst nightmare.
Check it out if you're doubtful of what i say. There's plenty info out there about it.
Then re-examine the whole thing using the new lens you have available.
You're welcome.
MItch, your expertise is legal. Please follow the technical explanation of how this is possible:
Voting equipment is required to have battery backup to prevent power disturbances from interfering with elections, neither blockouts, brownouts, nor surges. These all occur uncorrelated, but can also be caused by sabotage so this is a generally wise policy.
HOWEVER, battery backup devices are given "root level" priority in consumer operating systems so they have superior access to the machine core beyond any security software used to prevent hacking.
A large percentage of those battery backup devices are supplied by Tripp-Lite, a long respected manufacturer of power protection devices. That company was sold to an entity with Peter Thiel as a major stockholder, and the proceeds of the sale were donated to 2024 Repuglican campaigns. The Tripp-Lite machines all have an Internet port to update software and for "routine testing and maintenance" controlled by a company run server. This creates a back door with root access into a vast number of voting machines, and the ability to monitor and change the voting counts in real time EVEN THOUGH THE VOTING MACHINE DOES NOT HAVE A DIRECT CONNECTION TO THE INTERNET.
Free lance investigators discovered this back door after detecting a troubling pattern in voting. In many counties in swing states, an anomalous number of ballots voting a straight Democratic slate but missing a choice for president appeared starting around noon. These resulted in slightly over the margin for Trump that would trigger an automatic recount. The pattern was so strong that it is not possible to be randomness.
I appreciate all of the effort that went into this, but this whole thing is silly. You decide?
What then was Musk talking about when texting Ashley St. Clair? How did Musk conclude T won prior to results being aired? Seems there was some conspiracy and manipulations. T o solve much of this all that is required is hand counts of ballots. Politicians refuse through their silence and lack of commentary to do this. There is a lot of evidence the vote counts were manipulated. This needs justification. There needs to vote counts in this democratic republic, bottom line. Only then can we resolve the many questiions posted by analysis and staistical data. Why no to a count? Why the cover-up by our elected officials?
The lady may be correctly reporting what she understood of what Trump told her.
. . . That doesn't mean that he was telling the truth.
. . . It doesn't mean that she understood what he was saying, correctly.
I'd be suspicious, rather than gullible. But that's a bias, not a conclusion.
. Charles
For sure. I actually believe she's stating what he told her. She read his actual text to her during an interview. And I also believe Musk used every lever he had to sway the election (mostly money and social media influence). But as presented in the post, we didn't see any evidence to support that satellites were used.
The battery packs
Grateful for your tackling of this unwieldy hornet’s nest that is difficult for many of us to wrap our aging brains around. My biggest concern is that I have not yet read or heard a logical explanation for the anomalies that were found and why on earth did we not actually see some audits done in the states where the data was the wonkiest.
I am interested in whatever explanation in regards to the Fake vote bank anyone cares to rationalize/debunk
https://thiswillhold.substack.com/p/she-won-florida-used-a-fake-county?utm_source=direct&r=2xpfg&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=post%20viewer
Elon lives in an alternate universe. Some of his creative fantasies do turn into reality, ie, going to Mars. He can be dangerous to others. He will not get custody of Romlus, except for shared time. He has already demonstrated publicly how he uses X to gain attention.
Who are you though and what do you have to gain or lose in this? Why were there so many ballots in swing states voting Democrat down ballot but for Trump at the top? Why were the swing state results so severe toward Trump while non swing states had normal results? Mitch? Splain that.
I can't. Maybe there was election interference. This article was focused on whether or not satellites were used and it seems to confirm that that aspect of interference wasn't the case.
Thank you. If you’re interested in this actively, I hope you continue to dig. I am an intelligent person, I’ve been involved in information technology since the early 80’s, so I understand a little. My doubts come in as follows:
• I hear Trump say you’ll never have to vote again, we’ll have it fixed so good. And I don’t need your votes, we already have it fixed.
• I read Elon admit to being responsible for the outcome of the election. We all heard rumors that he would tamper with the outcome or the ballots. I read rumors that Elon sent pre-filled mail in ballots.
• Trump won all the swing states. That didn’t seem possible to me. I read that he won by a larger swing than usual. I read rumors that only the top of the ticket was Trump.
• The polls. I know, polls are inaccurate but I didn’t see it even close before the election.
Totally get it. And I appreciate your thoughts. Trump's comments would be inadmissible hearsay in court (not evidence). Rumors or comments from Musk are too. The point of my post was to see if there is any objective evidence linking the satellites to any of these issues. To date, I haven't seen it. Now that certainly doesn't mean there wasn't election interference by human beings on the ground and/or especially when it comes to false information, misinformation, and misleading social media posts. But that's a different issue, separate and apart from satellite interference. If I see something concrete, I certainly will update my article. I'm not trying to be right on this issue. I'm just sharing an objective analysis based upon the recent news stories.
Also, even though she is in litigation with Elon, it doesn’t necessarily negate her revelations. She didn’t go into detail because she doesn’t know, but she revealed what she heard. People often become turncoats when they’re angry. So that doesn’t negate what she says to me.
I was suspicious at first, but I think you’re sincere now, after your responses. As a trial lawyer you can only use the evidence you have. I know you were discussing satellite interference, although you drew a conclusion based on available information. Of course, that’s all we have, good or bad. There are other ways to hack an outcome though:
• Electronic warfare — jamming communications or GPS signals, also real.
• Cyber warfare — hacking networks or systems.
Since both Elon and Trump are criminal braggarts, my take is that they were bragging while revealing, as psychopathic criminals do.
It’s upsetting to me that these criminals are so blatant, while we are helpless to suffer the consequences. I’m grateful, so very grateful for people like you. Thank you.
This "issue" makes me wish we had a National Service that required citizens to be trained in how elections are done--the actual handling of ballots etc. I know enough from friends to know it is detailed, intensive, DULL, double-and triple-checking work.
Election security questions originated as a right wing psy-op. But elections are complicated systems, and Republicans really do not do "complicated." Club you over the head, yes. Think through a problem even at an undergraduate level of reasoning and knowledge? No. Just look at DOGE (or Iran).
Poor Ashley St. Clair, locked for life into drama. Elon bragged he had fixed the election for Trump. Was this before he had lured her into bed? Or was he just peacocking around? Just the way he carried on about
DOGE and saving so much money, right?